Marc Levine’s bad solution to a nonexistent problem

Sacramento is as quickly as soon as extra making an attempt to clear up points that don’t exist, this time inside the kind of a bill requiring everyone to vote — or else.

Or else what? Who is conscious of. One of the asinine choices of the bill is that it defers accountability of creating a punishment to the secretary of state.

Of course, we’re ready to more than likely be certain that there will be a super, a democracy tax in case you’ll.

The bill is authored by Assemblyman Marc Levine, D-San Rafael, who’s best usually known as the lawmaker whose solution to California’s housing catastrophe is to get a sweetheart exemption for Marin County from having to regulate to statewide housing requirements.

Compulsory voting in all probability violates the First Amendment. Freedom of speech means I have the freedom to particular my opinion by not voting. Levine’s workaround is that voters would possibly return ballots that have not been snuffed out. Remind me why we’re doing this as soon as extra?

One widespread argument in opposition to compulsory voting is that it’s going to dumb down the residents.

Just like in high school, voters would possibly merely select their favorite patterns on the Scantron ballot, guesstimate the suitable reply or just cheat off the person subsequent to them.

Levine in all probability believes that if everyone was compelled to vote, their consciences would get proper of them and drive voters to prove to be additional educated, though it’s arduous to uncover the proof to help that.

The annual Annenberg Civics Knowledge Survey carried out on the University of Pennsylvania reported in 2019 that solely 39 % of American adults can title all three branches of presidency, and that was a five-year extreme.

Liberal pundits love to use Brexit as an illustration of democracy gone bad.

Just as voters in 2016 narrowly licensed withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, Google search ends within the UK spiked on the questions “What is the EU?” and “What does it mean to leave the EU?”

This occasion is speculative (as a result of it was when liberal pundits had been using it to mock UK voters on election night time), nevertheless, it does suggest a weak relationship between voting and information.

A citizen’s price is simply not determined by an ample understanding of civics. But the widespread lack of understanding does suggest that essential voting is simply not going to restore regardless of the problem Marc Levine believes exists. Besides, voluntary voter participation has been rising anyway.

As with many bad ideas in Sacramento, lawmakers have been trying to find options from abroad. Numbers fluctuate, nevertheless, 20 or 30 nations have some type of requirement to vote.

Australia, which has no Bill of Rights, is one. North Korea moreover requires voting — in any case, they solely have one candidate and likewise, it’s possible you’ll be jailed and tortured within the occasion you don’t help him, nevertheless, that’s irrelevant.

Everyone ought to vote, nevertheless, that’s fully totally different from saying everyone ought to vote. Levine knowledgeable the Los Angeles Times: “Democracy is not a spectator sport.”

That assertion little query sounded good when he snagged it from the Big Book of Political Cliches, nevertheless, it has no price within the true world.

People ought to be involved, nevertheless, they should not be required to be involved.

Levine knowledgeable the San Francisco Chronicle: “Too many Californians are opting out and having decisions made for them and to them that are not in their best interest.”

The second a part of that quote may be very true, though perhaps not in one of the simplest ways Levine supposed.

The state Legislature is regularly eroding the citizenry’s choices and rights.

I do not understand why liberal lawmakers have such a strong time giving residents the freedom to choose how they want to reside in their lives.

Requiring everyone to vote is as ridiculous as requiring everyone to private a gun. Just as a result of I have the suitable would not indicate I’ve to prepare it.

Levine has likened compulsory voting to jury obligation. There is one enormous distinction. Under the Sixth Amendment, we have applied to a trial by jury, which could more than likely be unattainable without compulsory jury obligation, as a result of most people hate it.

When lawmakers run a majority of those funds, it’s usually just for consideration.

If Levine wishes to promote civic engagement, perhaps he ought to have a look at what’s being taught in colleges.

Make civics participating and probably the problem will proceed to clear up itself.

Or probably he would possibly make voting additional participating by addressing precise points, similar to the extreme worth of residing or the housing shortage and stop dropping time telling people how to reside their lives.

Matt Fleming is communications expertise and a former legislative staffer, California Republican Party staffer, and journalist.

Be the first to comment on "Marc Levine’s bad solution to a nonexistent problem"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.