Caltrans must be held accountable for misspent funds




It was clear from the beginning that voters didn’t imagine Sacramento to spend new gasoline tax revenue for its promised capabilities.

In the push to cross Senate Bill 1 in 2017, Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature agreed to put a “lockbox” measure on the ballot to protect the model-new transportation revenue towards funds raids, and they also moreover agreed to create a model-new place at Caltrans — a neutral inspector fundamental with the authority to analysis transportation duties and guarantee public is spent appropriately and legally.

Senate Bill 1 handed narrowly, sharply elevating taxes on gasoline and diesel along with a noticeable hike in automotive registration prices. Californians had been instructed the revenue from the tax enhance would be used to revive roads and bridges and fund transit enhancements.

Clearly skeptical, voters handed the “lockbox” measure, Proposition 69 on the June 2018 ballot, with over 80% of the vote. Yet the lock appeared to be picked earlier this 12 months when Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a govt order to redirect transportation funds to duties that deal with native climate change.

Even sooner than that, Newsom threatened to withhold SB1 funds from cities that did not assemble enough housing. That proposal met with resistance and appears to have been dropped. Still, the whole prepare has solely served to increase the set off for suspicion about diversions of tax revenue away from the use that was promised.

The neutral inspector fundamental may be off to a higher start. Rhonda L. Craft was appointed to the place 5 months prior to now and has merely supplied her first report at a gathering of the California Transportation Commission.

Craft’s report detailed the outcomes of 70 audits and 400 evaluations. For the fiscal 12 months that ended June 30, the auditors found $13 million in “disallowed” expenditures for the fiscal 12 months that ended June 30. This included $7.4 million of bond funds had been spent improperly for purposes lined by the $19.9 billion transportation bond, Proposition 1B, approved by state voters in 2006.

The auditors found no misuse of SB1 funds, nonetheless then, it’s nonetheless early.

Craft’s workforce moreover investigated tons of complaints about Caltrans workers. They substantiated wrongdoing in 28 circumstances, along with some that involved falsification of paperwork, misuse of state pc techniques and cars, conflicts of curiosity and substance abuse.

Assemblyman Vince Fong, R-Bakersfield, who’s vice chairman of the Assembly Transportation Committee, said: “the status quo is not acceptable.” Transportation Commissioner Yvonne Burke said, “We think that if there are issues that have to be addressed they should be addressed.” Caltrans spokesman Matt Rocco said Caltrans has recouped $1.3 million and might work to boost its processes.

No one must make the error of pondering they will concern an announcement saying the suitable issue after which return to ignoring the problem.

Californians pay the perfect gasoline taxes inside the nation, and Caltrans’ funds are $14.2 billion. There is not an excuse for crumbling roads and bridges or for wasteful contracts that enrich consultants without bettering transit strategies. Elected officers must be doing further to confirm the taxpayers’ money is properly spent.

Caltrans must be held accountable, and so must elect officers if they provide the impression of being the other method as consultants and contractors milk the system.




Be the first to comment on "Caltrans must be held accountable for misspent funds"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*